Topklasse Discussion Board  
Home Forum Legal/Privacy Media/Picture Gallery Websites and Links Technical

Go Back   Topklasse Discussion Board > THE EXPERIENCE - DRIVING PLEASURE > ROAD TESTS

ROAD TESTS Road tests and related articles

Reply
 
Thread Tools Search this Thread Display Modes
  #1  
Old 28th July 2012, 10:18 AM
Oversize's Avatar
Oversize Oversize is offline
Aristocrat
 
Join Date: Apr 2010
Location: Melbourne
Posts: 4,327
Default Fangio & the 6.9

A rather glowing road test of an Aussie 6.9 in the UK...

http://www.pistonheads.com/gassing/t...EL+6%2E9&mid=0

It does raise some interesting questions:

As the SLS ages does the body roll become more pronounced? Or does the 6.9 appear to have more roll now, because we're comparing it to newer cars? Significant body roll wasn't reported in the road tests conducted when the car was first released; but maybe that's because they where comparing it to other cars of the era with huge amounts of roll....

I've heard of James Hunt 'blowing up' several 6.9s somewhere else. How exactly does one blow one up (not that I intend to try)? Could it be he modified, or replaced the rotor buttons and over-revved the engines???
__________________
Mark

01 Ford AU 5L (Deep Blue)
88 420L Euro#-P
88 420L#-P
88 420L#2477-P
87 560L#2020 (Dora 2)
87 560L #9987
87 420L#4309-P
87 420L#-P
86 560L#5896-P
79 6.9#5541 (Red Bull)
78 6.9#4248 (Skye)
79 6.9#3686 (Moby Dick)
78 6.9#1776 (Dora 1)
77 450L#7010-P
75 450L#8414 (Gold Nugget)-P
57 Buick 73A (Titanic)
Reply With Quote
  #2  
Old 28th July 2012, 11:03 AM
motec 6.9's Avatar
motec 6.9 motec 6.9 is offline
Prodigal Son
 
Join Date: Jan 2009
Location: perth
Posts: 5,917
Default Re: Fangio & the 6.9

Hi Mark interestingly the Ex Kennet car reported here before was the press car driven by Fangio in Australia . Geoff
Reply With Quote
  #3  
Old 28th July 2012, 02:25 PM
motec 6.9's Avatar
motec 6.9 motec 6.9 is offline
Prodigal Son
 
Join Date: Jan 2009
Location: perth
Posts: 5,917
Default Re: Fangio & the 6.9

Hi Mark this car it was also featured in uniquecars i looked at buying it in2009 when it was for sale in Perth in 2009 http://www.shannons.com.au/auctions/...WB80429J9E87A1 Geoff
Reply With Quote
  #4  
Old 25th September 2012, 07:10 PM
Styria's Avatar
Styria Styria is online now
The Godfather
 
Join Date: Feb 2008
Location: Sydney
Posts: 8,174
Default Re: Fangio & the 6.9

Interesting review of Fangio's drive but, more importantly, some salient remarks and details about 6.9s. I also managed to dig up the Ronin video of a 6.9 involved in a car chase.

http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=HPI5-TSdC9w

I had never seen that video before, so it was most enjoyable and a real eye opener. Also, Mark raises some interesting questions in his post regarding handling of our 6.9s. From what I have heard in days gone by, one mechanic has always maintained that 6.9s did not handle well even when quite new. The handling seemed to be a bit boatlike (his words), and I also know of one owner that bought both a 450 and 6.9 when new, and he's always maintained that the 450 was his preferred driver.

It is also possible for me to cast my mind back probably about fourteen years when a friend of mine (with a 450SEL) and myself with Gleaming Beauty were on a joint drive, with both of us 'trying' on a challenging, open road. (The Bells Line of Road for Sydneysiders). There was no doubt that he gave me a hard time handling wise, and I could only shake him (to some extent) under acceleration uphills. I tend to think that slow corners or roundabouts cause them to somewhat heel over, but overall the handling is quite good - a little better than my 420SEL - at speed on the open road. Regards Styria
Reply With Quote
  #5  
Old 25th September 2012, 11:17 PM
SEL_69L's Avatar
SEL_69L SEL_69L is offline
Aristocrat
 
Join Date: Feb 2009
Location: Sydney, NSW, Australia
Posts: 1,123
Default Re: Fangio & the 6.9

The funnest way I have found for accelerating my 6.9 is to get it rolling to about 10km/ hr, THEN floor it. Speed builds very rapidly after that!

Just for fun I sometimes do this, accelerating from 10 km/ hr to 60 km /hr. That way, you stay the right side of the law, and there is less of a possibility of accidently bending metal.

One of the main problems with the 6.9 is that with that big cast iron engine over the front tyres, you are really asking a lot of them, and tends to make the car nose heavy, relative to other W116's.

Last edited by SEL_69L; 25th September 2012 at 11:21 PM.
Reply With Quote
  #6  
Old 26th September 2012, 09:19 PM
Oversize's Avatar
Oversize Oversize is offline
Aristocrat
 
Join Date: Apr 2010
Location: Melbourne
Posts: 4,327
Default Re: Fangio & the 6.9

Quote:
Originally Posted by SEL_69L View Post
The funnest way I have found for accelerating my 6.9 is to get it rolling to about 10km/ hr, THEN floor it. Speed builds very rapidly after that!

Just for fun I sometimes do this, accelerating from 10 km/ hr to 60 km /hr. That way, you stay the right side of the law, and there is less of a possibility of accidently bending metal.

One of the main problems with the 6.9 is that with that big cast iron engine over the front tyres, you are really asking a lot of them, and tends to make the car nose heavy, relative to other W116's.
I'm hoping a decent set of 18" wheels and tyres will solve some of the understeer issues.... Or just hit the gas and balance it with oversteer!!! But perhaps that will just end in a 4x4 slide! LOL!
__________________
Mark

01 Ford AU 5L (Deep Blue)
88 420L Euro#-P
88 420L#-P
88 420L#2477-P
87 560L#2020 (Dora 2)
87 560L #9987
87 420L#4309-P
87 420L#-P
86 560L#5896-P
79 6.9#5541 (Red Bull)
78 6.9#4248 (Skye)
79 6.9#3686 (Moby Dick)
78 6.9#1776 (Dora 1)
77 450L#7010-P
75 450L#8414 (Gold Nugget)-P
57 Buick 73A (Titanic)
Reply With Quote
  #7  
Old 27th September 2012, 06:38 AM
Michel's Avatar
Michel Michel is offline
One Of The Boys
 
Join Date: Feb 2008
Location: Sydney, Australia
Posts: 8,523
Default Re: Fangio & the 6.9

Dont' know what you guys are on about?
over steer... under steer...

__________________
Michel

1978 W116 690SEL # 3312
1985 R107 500SL AMG
2000 W208 CLK430 Coupe
2003 W163 ML320
Reply With Quote
  #8  
Old 27th September 2012, 07:35 AM
motec 6.9's Avatar
motec 6.9 motec 6.9 is offline
Prodigal Son
 
Join Date: Jan 2009
Location: perth
Posts: 5,917
Default Re: Fangio & the 6.9

Hi Michel it looks like you Zigged when you should have Zagged. LOL Geoff
Reply With Quote
  #9  
Old 27th September 2012, 12:16 PM
Michel's Avatar
Michel Michel is offline
One Of The Boys
 
Join Date: Feb 2008
Location: Sydney, Australia
Posts: 8,523
Default Re: Fangio & the 6.9

Quote:
Originally Posted by motec 6.9 View Post
Hi Michel it looks like you Zigged when you should have Zagged. LOL Geoff

__________________
Michel

1978 W116 690SEL # 3312
1985 R107 500SL AMG
2000 W208 CLK430 Coupe
2003 W163 ML320
Reply With Quote
  #10  
Old 27th September 2012, 12:43 PM
260ebenz's Avatar
260ebenz 260ebenz is offline
Noble
 
Join Date: Dec 2009
Location: NSW
Posts: 6,431
Default Re: Fangio & the 6.9

Quote:
Originally Posted by Michel View Post
Dont' know what you guys are on about?
over steer... under steer...

Michel is that you speeding again or just using the 6.9 as a get away car again? LOL.
Reply With Quote
  #11  
Old 27th September 2012, 10:02 PM
Oversize's Avatar
Oversize Oversize is offline
Aristocrat
 
Join Date: Apr 2010
Location: Melbourne
Posts: 4,327
Default Re: Fangio & the 6.9

Braking mid-corner???!!! An intentional drift perhaps?? LOL!
__________________
Mark

01 Ford AU 5L (Deep Blue)
88 420L Euro#-P
88 420L#-P
88 420L#2477-P
87 560L#2020 (Dora 2)
87 560L #9987
87 420L#4309-P
87 420L#-P
86 560L#5896-P
79 6.9#5541 (Red Bull)
78 6.9#4248 (Skye)
79 6.9#3686 (Moby Dick)
78 6.9#1776 (Dora 1)
77 450L#7010-P
75 450L#8414 (Gold Nugget)-P
57 Buick 73A (Titanic)
Reply With Quote
  #12  
Old 28th September 2012, 05:47 AM
Michel's Avatar
Michel Michel is offline
One Of The Boys
 
Join Date: Feb 2008
Location: Sydney, Australia
Posts: 8,523
Default Re: Fangio & the 6.9

Quote:
Originally Posted by Oversize View Post
Braking mid-corner???!!! An intentional drift perhaps?? LOL!
There certainly was no braking mid corner!
All the braking was was done Before..

These are headlights/taillights you see
__________________
Michel

1978 W116 690SEL # 3312
1985 R107 500SL AMG
2000 W208 CLK430 Coupe
2003 W163 ML320
Reply With Quote
  #13  
Old 28th September 2012, 01:41 PM
SEL_69L's Avatar
SEL_69L SEL_69L is offline
Aristocrat
 
Join Date: Feb 2009
Location: Sydney, NSW, Australia
Posts: 1,123
Default Re: Fangio & the 6.9

If you are going to replace the 14" Bundts with bigger wheels, two important factors must be remembered:

1. Ideally, 7" wide wheels should be used, but it is essential that the correct offset for the wheel width be used, so that the axis of the kingpin passes through the centre of the contact patch on the road. (Zero offset steering), otherwise the front end grip at the limit will be affected.

2. With 7" wide wheels, the standard 215 mm wide tyre is what Mercedes originally reccomended. If wider tyres are used, it is ESSENTIAL that every time you park the vehicle, that the front wheels are in the straight ahead position.
If you don't, and the suspension goes down, the arches of the wheel wells will collapse onto the top of the tyres, and bent metal could be the result.

Currently, I am thinking of putting 16" wheels from a W126 on my car.
The standard tyre specification for the 6.9 is
215 x 70 x 14.
I am thinking of tyres with spec.
225 x 60 x 16. I am not all that keen on wider tyres than that, because of the problems associated with a settling suspension, mentioned above.

Properly designed lower profile tyres can result in less tyre case distortion under hard cornering. Speak to your local KNOWLEDGEABLE tyre dealer about what's best. Some low profile tyres are just window dressing at best.
Reply With Quote
  #14  
Old 28th September 2012, 07:53 PM
Oversize's Avatar
Oversize Oversize is offline
Aristocrat
 
Join Date: Apr 2010
Location: Melbourne
Posts: 4,327
Default Re: Fangio & the 6.9

Bundts are on par with Porsche wheels being super-light. So it's a huge shame the tyres available are quite limited. Modern alloys are heavy in comparison (even the MB stuff).

I agree that offset is critical to any different wheels you're thinking of fitting. With the right offset and diameter, the max tyre width on the front of a W116 is probably 235s and on the rear 265s. One day I'll get around to testing my theory!
__________________
Mark

01 Ford AU 5L (Deep Blue)
88 420L Euro#-P
88 420L#-P
88 420L#2477-P
87 560L#2020 (Dora 2)
87 560L #9987
87 420L#4309-P
87 420L#-P
86 560L#5896-P
79 6.9#5541 (Red Bull)
78 6.9#4248 (Skye)
79 6.9#3686 (Moby Dick)
78 6.9#1776 (Dora 1)
77 450L#7010-P
75 450L#8414 (Gold Nugget)-P
57 Buick 73A (Titanic)
Reply With Quote
Reply

Thread Tools Search this Thread
Search this Thread:

Advanced Search
Display Modes

Posting Rules
You may not post new threads
You may not post replies
You may not post attachments
You may not edit your posts

BB code is On
Smilies are On
[IMG] code is On
HTML code is Off

Forum Jump


All times are GMT +10. The time now is 04:41 PM.


Powered by vBulletin® Version 3.8.10
Copyright ©2000 - 2018, vBulletin Solutions, Inc.
Copyright Topklasse 2017