Topklasse Discussion Board  
Home Forum Legal/Privacy Media/Picture Gallery Websites and Links Technical

Go Back   Topklasse Discussion Board > THE CRAFTSMAN - TECHNICAL DEPARTMENT > MECHANICALS

MECHANICALS With a 30 year-old automobile, there will always be discussion here - maintenance, modifications and mechanicals.

Reply
 
Thread Tools Search this Thread Display Modes
  #1  
Old 9th February 2012, 07:58 AM
Oversize's Avatar
Oversize Oversize is offline
Aristocrat
 
Join Date: Apr 2010
Location: Melbourne
Posts: 4,303
Default D-Jet to K-Jet and back

Can anyone explain why MB used D-Jet (which is very similar to today's MPFI systems), then went to K-Jet (which wastes fuel through continuous injection) and then went back to something similar to the old D-Jet??? It seems to me they tried something different, but found it wasn't any better and went back to something that everyone else was using. I ask myself the same question with the vacuum central locking vs electric... Then there's airbags, hydropneumatic and back to airbags... What gives?
__________________
Mark

01 Ford AU 5L (Deep Blue)
89 560L#322020
88 500L#451660-P
88 420L#422477-P
87 420L#324309-P
87 420L#-P
88 420L Euro#-P
88 420L#-P
86 560L#235896-P
79 6.9#5541 (Red Bull)
78 6.9#4248 (Skye)
79 6.9#3686 (Moby Dick)
78 6.9#1776 (Dora)
77 450L#067010-P
75 450L#028414 (Gold Nugget)-P
57 Buick 73A (Titanic)
Reply With Quote
  #2  
Old 10th February 2012, 02:45 AM
Styria's Avatar
Styria Styria is offline
The Godfather
 
Join Date: Feb 2008
Location: Sydney
Posts: 8,166
Default Re: D-Jet to K-Jet and back

Mark, I am just not so sure that I can answer your post correctly. Regarding injection, let's not forget that it was Bosch that designed the various systems and the manufacturers would use whatever Bosch would place at their disposal. Back in the '70s, emissions was a dirty word, and K-Jet was formulated and introduced as cutting on emissions. Engines were supposed to run much cleaner. So K-Jet and KE lasted until the early '90s.

Since then, of course, computer controlled injection has taken over, and engine management, injection and sensors have taken fuel injection to an entirely more advanced and efficient level.

Regarding suspension with its variation from air to hydraulics and back to air, it pays to remember that Mercedes, with its own and unique 6.9 system - oh, and we must include Citroen, were just about the only manufacturers to offer a hydraulic system. Air suspension is now offered only on high price vehicles such as Mercedes and Range Rover (any others ?), but let us not forget that the McLaren MP4C (?) offers a hydraulic system that is much reminiscent of the old 6.9 arrangement. There is a lengthy and thorough appraisal of the McLaren system somewhere on our website. Regards Styria

N.B. Okay, found it. Introduced by none other than Mark. Have a careful read of how the system works. Marvellous.

http://www.topklasse.net.au/forums/s...hlight=McLaren

Last edited by Styria; 10th February 2012 at 02:50 AM.
Reply With Quote
  #3  
Old 10th February 2012, 10:28 AM
WiSeGuYY's Avatar
WiSeGuYY WiSeGuYY is offline
Aristocrat
 
Join Date: May 2011
Location: Cairo Egypt
Posts: 1,219
Default Re: D-Jet to K-Jet and back

INTERESETED??? MARK , in 1970 i was about to enter UNI to study MECHANICAL Engineering and my dad at that time managed to divert my passion to CIVIL ENGINEERING ( glad he did) still love cars but buildings are really have other feeling.
PLUS rthey don't move as fast TECHNOLOGY i mean.

few month ago i did visit the BMW dealer i had overheat lamp was on. they kept the car for 24 hours to check why the water was down , in the past you just open the hood and fill more water, now there are no place to fill the water LOL.

REGARDS

TAREK
Reply With Quote
  #4  
Old 10th February 2012, 09:46 PM
Tony66_au's Avatar
Tony66_au Tony66_au is offline
Aristocrat
 
Join Date: Oct 2010
Location: Gippsland, Vic
Posts: 2,307
Default Re: D-Jet to K-Jet and back

Mark I believe the K jet upgrade was in response to the US emissions laws and the oil crisis in the early 70's.

Bear in mind that the US would be a very valuable market for any car maker and looking at how other manufacturers model lineup changed in 1973 thru 1978 Mercedes Benz solution was a clever one.

So while the others were downsizing their cars and engines to cope Mercedes sacrificed some power.

But for what its worth I too think that Mechanical fuel injection has no right to be in a car after 1970.
Reply With Quote
  #5  
Old 10th February 2012, 09:50 PM
Tony66_au's Avatar
Tony66_au Tony66_au is offline
Aristocrat
 
Join Date: Oct 2010
Location: Gippsland, Vic
Posts: 2,307
Default Re: D-Jet to K-Jet and back

BTW Vacuum Central locking was a safety feature incase your vehicle ended up in water without electrics.
Reply With Quote
Reply

Thread Tools Search this Thread
Search this Thread:

Advanced Search
Display Modes

Posting Rules
You may not post new threads
You may not post replies
You may not post attachments
You may not edit your posts

BB code is On
Smilies are On
[IMG] code is On
HTML code is Off

Forum Jump

Similar Threads
Thread Thread Starter Forum Replies Last Post
It's back!!! (at last) 450SE EXTERIORS & BODY REPAIRS 27 16th July 2012 12:34 PM
I'm back ! CraigS TALKING TORQUE 21 22nd August 2009 06:17 AM
The Sad 600 Is Back! Des TRADING POST/EBAY LISTINGS 16 5th June 2008 10:12 AM


All times are GMT +10. The time now is 02:18 PM.


Powered by vBulletin® Version 3.8.10
Copyright ©2000 - 2018, vBulletin Solutions, Inc.
Copyright Topklasse 2017